無料アクセスカウンターofuda.cc「全世界カウント計画」
■掲示板に戻る■ 全部 1- 101- 201- 301- 401- 501- 601- 701- 801- 901- 最新50 [PR]ぜろちゃんねるプラス[PR]  
レス数が1000を超えています。残念ながら全部は表示しません。

【フリー経営シム】Simutransを語るスレ Part10

703 :名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。:2005/11/08(火) 19:02:17 ID:Gl6CtyI9
チラシの裏だけじゃアレなので、本家に書き込んできました。

Simutrans is very much evaluated, and it appreciates it in Japan
Then, it is being discussed from the point of view to improve this more.
So, I want to propose some argument here.


-The algorithm of the passenger's course choice
When there are many courses, passengers are probably deciding a course as follows.

1.They priority to the little course of the transport capacity.
2.They gives priority to the course which the transfer number of times is small in.
3.They give priority to a bus.

But, the following ill effect arises by these.

1.They try to transfer in the station which an opportunity of taking is rare in.
2.They come back to the station at the back unnecessarily, and try to get it on.
3.They don't have the general idea of the distance, and it goes for the unnecessary trip.
4.Unnecessary congestion occurs because the amount of transport of the bus is small and moreover they are concentrated on that.

Therefore, I ask a solution as follows.

1.They give priority to the big course of the transport capacity.
2.They give priority to a distance, and a transfer adds a fixed distance.
They choose trains more than buses. If it says more, the one that top speed is fast is chosen.


But, this is only one example, and there may be a possibly better thing in it.
I hope. Argument is deepened more, a better algorithm system is completed.

英語を書くのはあんまり自信が無いけど、こんなものでよかったかな。
おかしいと思う人、修正お願いします。

294KB
Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional READ.CGI - 0ch+ BBS 0.6.5 20120615
ぜろちゃんねる :: ぜろちゃんねるプラス